<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for entropicaccess dot net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://entropicaccess.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://entropicaccess.net</link>
	<description>Nothing from something.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 05:23:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on A title. by Tod Hansmann</title>
		<link>http://entropicaccess.net/2010/01/17/28/comment-page-1/#comment-1400</link>
		<dc:creator>Tod Hansmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 05:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entropicaccess.net/?p=28#comment-1400</guid>
		<description>Indeed you are.  Walgreens has some old rockstar programmers though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed you are.  Walgreens has some old rockstar programmers though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trust in Compilers by Paul Peter Porges</title>
		<link>http://entropicaccess.net/2007/03/31/trust-in-compilers/comment-page-1/#comment-1244</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Peter Porges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entropicaccess.net/2007/03/31/trust-in-compilers/#comment-1244</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right about the complexity of semantic analysis, this sounds impossible, especially considering there has been no real improvemnts in &quot;semantic intelligence&quot; since the 70&#039;ies, where everybody thought the computer would someday soon outsmart us.

I must agree with James, that if you can solve the platform/hardware adaptation problem, this threat would be much more plausible.

Remember however, that past problems, which seemed impossible to solve, have been solved, like the Poincare Conjecture.

Btw, the paper: http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/712.fall02/papers/p761-thompson.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right about the complexity of semantic analysis, this sounds impossible, especially considering there has been no real improvemnts in &#8220;semantic intelligence&#8221; since the 70&#8242;ies, where everybody thought the computer would someday soon outsmart us.</p>
<p>I must agree with James, that if you can solve the platform/hardware adaptation problem, this threat would be much more plausible.</p>
<p>Remember however, that past problems, which seemed impossible to solve, have been solved, like the Poincare Conjecture.</p>
<p>Btw, the paper: <a href="http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/712.fall02/papers/p761-thompson.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/712.fall02/papers/p761-thompson.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trust in Compilers by James</title>
		<link>http://entropicaccess.net/2007/03/31/trust-in-compilers/comment-page-1/#comment-1239</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entropicaccess.net/2007/03/31/trust-in-compilers/#comment-1239</guid>
		<description>The problem would be to adapt the original malign 
code for compilers compiled on new (and different) hardware. 

It&#039;s a scary thought, but it&#039;s only just that--a thought.

Would make for an interesting novel ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem would be to adapt the original malign<br />
code for compilers compiled on new (and different) hardware. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a scary thought, but it&#8217;s only just that&#8211;a thought.</p>
<p>Would make for an interesting novel ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Software Engineering Best Practices as a Student by James</title>
		<link>http://entropicaccess.net/2007/04/02/software-engineering-best-practices-as-a-student/comment-page-1/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entropicaccess.net/2007/04/02/software-engineering-best-practices-as-a-student/#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>This would be a godsend :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would be a godsend :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About the Author by Trish G</title>
		<link>http://entropicaccess.net/about-the-author/comment-page-1/#comment-1195</link>
		<dc:creator>Trish G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entropicaccess.net/about-the-author/#comment-1195</guid>
		<description>For some reason I was having a FNET convo and your name came up. . I decided to be horribly annoying, stalk you, and say hello! 

&#039;allo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason I was having a FNET convo and your name came up. . I decided to be horribly annoying, stalk you, and say hello! </p>
<p>&#8216;allo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Newvow by Alex Levy</title>
		<link>http://entropicaccess.net/2007/03/19/newvow/comment-page-1/#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entropicaccess.net/2007/03/19/newvow/#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used Nevow for a number of projects and it&#039;s a great toolkit. It&#039;s not geared towards &quot;quick and dirty&quot; webapps the way some other frameworks are, but it has some of its own very powerful tools. The templating engine is very mature, and Athena (its AJAX module) is far more robust than a lot of the other approaches I&#039;ve seen to writing client/server web applications. 

Plus, it&#039;s built on top of Twisted, so there&#039;s a lot of other powerful things you can integrate with your server code that are normally much harder to do in a synchronous, thread-based framework.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used Nevow for a number of projects and it&#8217;s a great toolkit. It&#8217;s not geared towards &#8220;quick and dirty&#8221; webapps the way some other frameworks are, but it has some of its own very powerful tools. The templating engine is very mature, and Athena (its AJAX module) is far more robust than a lot of the other approaches I&#8217;ve seen to writing client/server web applications. </p>
<p>Plus, it&#8217;s built on top of Twisted, so there&#8217;s a lot of other powerful things you can integrate with your server code that are normally much harder to do in a synchronous, thread-based framework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Trust in Compilers by Michael-John Turner</title>
		<link>http://entropicaccess.net/2007/03/31/trust-in-compilers/comment-page-1/#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael-John Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 12:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entropicaccess.net/2007/03/31/trust-in-compilers/#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re thinking of Ken Thompson&#039;s classic paper &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.acm.org/classics/sep95/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Reflections on Trusting Trust&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re thinking of Ken Thompson&#8217;s classic paper <a href="http://www.acm.org/classics/sep95/" rel="nofollow">Reflections on Trusting Trust</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VMWare Server by Rob</title>
		<link>http://entropicaccess.net/2006/02/26/vmware-server/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 19:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entropicaccess.net/2006/02/26/vmware-server/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>NERD!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NERD!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on wwmoodle by Rob</title>
		<link>http://entropicaccess.net/2005/11/19/wwmoodle/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entropicaccess.net/?p=12#comment-7</guid>
		<description>You are such a nerd. But then again, so am I. It is for this in which You rock my face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are such a nerd. But then again, so am I. It is for this in which You rock my face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [Addendum] HPT372A and Linux 2.6 by peter</title>
		<link>http://entropicaccess.net/2005/06/24/addendum-hpt372a-and-linux-26/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2005 03:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://entropicaccess.net/2005/06/24/addendum-hpt372a-and-linux-26/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I must say though, the 3ware card I got to replace it is veeeeerrrry noice. Real in hardware RAID, a decent set of utilities that actually run in Linux.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say though, the 3ware card I got to replace it is veeeeerrrry noice. Real in hardware RAID, a decent set of utilities that actually run in Linux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
